<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Baillieu Blog - Latest Comments in The strange case of Hazel Blears and the HMRC</title><link>http://danvers.disqus.com/</link><description>Personal blog of Danvers Baillieu</description><atom:link href="https://danvers.disqus.com/the_strange_case_of_hazel_blears_and_the_hmrc/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 08:12:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The strange case of Hazel Blears and the HMRC</title><link>http://danversbaillieu.blogspot.com/2009/05/strange-case-of-hazel-blears-and-hmrc.html#comment-9405937</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Danvers - fab to see you &amp;amp; Barry at &lt;a href="http://www.thinkingdigital.co.uk" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.thinkingdigital.co.uk"&gt;Thinking Digital&lt;/a&gt; this week; I got to this page via &lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2009/may/14/mps-expenses-local-reaction" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2009/may/14/mps-expenses-local-reaction"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; from The Guardian.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Success &amp;amp; greater fame beckons! ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin Souter</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 08:12:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The strange case of Hazel Blears and the HMRC</title><link>http://danversbaillieu.blogspot.com/2009/05/strange-case-of-hazel-blears-and-hmrc.html#comment-9316386</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yup, I wondered about the rate. She's paid more than the current rate, so presumably it was at the old rate (40%) with deductions/reliefs added in - she possibly also granted herself her annual CGT allowance (which might account for it entirely).  Sorry no journalist asked at the time. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danvers</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 03:52:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The strange case of Hazel Blears and the HMRC</title><link>http://danversbaillieu.blogspot.com/2009/05/strange-case-of-hazel-blears-and-hmrc.html#comment-9299886</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting rate of 29.^% What was the prevailing rate of CGT at the time of the property transaction, I wonder?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aristeides</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 19:12:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The strange case of Hazel Blears and the HMRC</title><link>http://danversbaillieu.blogspot.com/2009/05/strange-case-of-hazel-blears-and-hmrc.html#comment-9298738</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It literally means "shamed joy" in German which is kind of applicable in the expenses fiasco :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sue</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:25:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The strange case of Hazel Blears and the HMRC</title><link>http://danversbaillieu.blogspot.com/2009/05/strange-case-of-hazel-blears-and-hmrc.html#comment-9275565</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Won't the Law Society have something to say about all this ?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Before the little chipmunk discovered the horn of plenty wasn't she a solicitor ? I assume she'll be one again after 2010.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Man in a Shed</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 07:29:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>